Documents
- Cedar River Current and Future Conditions. 1993. King. County
- Lower Cedar River Basin & Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan. 1996 & 1998. King County
Supplemental Reprints Organized by Topics in 19 Separate Binders
- Supplemental references organized by topics in separate binders.
- Class Cabinet and binders in Rm. 108.
- Check-out binders before and after class
- All other material needs to stay with Class Cabinet
- The Cedar River
- Fish Habitat and Population Responses
- Salmonid Habitat Requirements
- Hydrology and Stream Habitats
- Geomorphology: and Stream Habitats
- Large Woody Debris (LWD)
- Hyporheic Systems
- Macroinvertebrates
- Disturbance
- Restoration Strategies
- Restoration: Landscape-Scale Perspectives
- Artificial Fish Habitats
- Recovery & Monitoring
- Riparian and Wetland Management
- Riparian Animals
- Riparian and Wetland Restoration
- Issues–Conservation
- Issues–Exotic Species
- Issues–Salmon
Cardwell, A. (1997). A historical perspective of the Elliott Rreach: Cedar River, Washington. Report FISH 428. SOF, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 26 pages.
Collings, M., R. Smith, and G. T. Higgins. 1972. The hydrology of four streams in western Washington as related to several pacific salmon species (Introduction pages 1 — 7, Cedar River pages 30-47). Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1968. 108 page.
Chrzastowski, M. 1983. Historical changes to Lake Washington and route of the Lake Washington ship canal, King County, Washington. U. S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation. WRI 81-1182. 1-9. (Copy missing)
Fresh, K.L., G. Lucchetti and R. Little. 2000. Protecting and Restoring anadromous salmonids and their habitats in the Lake Washington watershed and urbanizing ecosystem. Sustainable Fisheries Management: Pacific Salmon. 525-544.
Elliott levee repair and habitat enhancement project, 1995. King County Surface Water Management in-house report.
Hendry, A. P., J. K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk, T. P. Quinn. 2000. Rapid Evolution of Reproductive Isolation in the Wild: Evidence from Introduced Salmon. Science 290: 516-518.
Hall, J. L., R. K. Timm and R. C. Wissmar. 2000. Physical And Biotic Factors Affecting Use of Riparian Ponds by Sockeye Salmon. International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association. 89-94
Malick, J. G. 1977. Ecology of benthos insects of the Cedar River, Washington. Ph.D. Dissertation. College of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (In Fish-Ocean Lib, UW).
May, C. W. and R. R. Horner. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-riparian ecosystems. International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association. 281-286.
Perkins, S.J. 1994. The Shrinking Cedar River -- Channel Changes following flow regulation andbank armoring. From: Effects of human-induced changes on hydrologic systems. American Water Resources Association pp 649-659.
Priest, W. 1995. Sockeye Spawner Salmon Survey for Selected Habitats of the Cedar River Basin. King County in-house report.
Solomon, F.P. 1994. Changes in Cedar River water quality and potential impacts on Lake Washington water quality, fisheries and habitat. Proposed for the Cedar River Watershed Management Committee.
Washington State Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory (SASSI) (1992). Lake Washington Drainage (Issaquah, Northern L. Washington Tribs, and Cedar River). Washington State salmon and steelhead stock inventory. "SASSI" Appendix One—Puget Sound stocks. Vol. 2 p. 21-105
Willis, K.W. Water Year 1996 Flood Summary Report. 1992. King County in-house report.
Wernecke, C. 1936. Part II- Cedar River: On Flood Control in King County. King County Planning Commission, Seattle, WA. 26 pages.
Wissmar, R. C., Douglas C. Pflugh and Ray K. Timm. 2000. Changes In Developed Land Cover (1991-1998): Cedar River, Washington. International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association. 287-292.
Watershed Management Committee: Lower Cedar River Basin and Nonpoint Pollution Action Plan. 1998. King County Department of Natural Resources, Seattle Washington (Executive Summary, Contents, Appendix E. "Estimation of salmonid production, and potential habitat restoration", "Habitat opportunity reports").
See class cabinet for the entire "Cedar River Action Plan".
Current and Future Conditions Report Current and Future Conditions Report. 1993. King County, Seattle Washington (Contents, Ch 7. Aquatic Habitat, Appendix A. "Conditions Summary")
See class cabinet for the Cedar River Current and Future Conditions Report
Cedar River: Miscellaneous documents
Salmonid resource management issues in the lower Cedar River basin, WA. 1992. King County, Seattle Washington.
Bayley, P. B. and L. L. Osborne. 1993. Natural rehabilitation of stream fish populations in an Illinois Catchment. Freshwater Biology 29: 295-300.
Beechie, T., E. Beamer, and L. Wasserman. 1994. Estimating coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for habitat restoration. North Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 14: 797-811.
Bisson et al. 1992. BMP, Cumulative Impacts & Fish Abundance, Chapter 7, Watershed Management, 189-232.
Cederholm, C. J., R. E. Bilby, P. A. Bisson, T. W. Bunstead, B. R. Fransen, W. J. Scarlett and J. W. Ward. 1997. Response of juvenile coho salmon and steelhead to placement of large woody debris in a coastal Washington. Stream. N. Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 17: 947-963.
Heifetz, J., M. L. Murphy and K. V. Koski. 1986. Effects of logging on winter habitat of juvenile salmonids in Alaskan streams. N. Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 6: 52-58.
Hicks, B. J. , et al. 1991. Responses of salmonids to habitat changes. 1991. Chapter 14, in Meehan, W. R. (ed.) Influences of Forests & Rangeland Management on Salmonids Fish & Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19: 483-518.
Hicks, B. J, R. L. Beschta and D. R. Harr. 1991. Long-term changes in streamflow following logging in western Oregon and associated fisheries implications. Water Resources Bulletin. 27: 217-225.
Meehan, W. R. and T. C. Bjorn.1991. Salmonid distributions and life histories. Chapter 3, in Meehan, W. R. (ed.) Influences of Forests & Rangeland Management on Salmonids Fish & Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19: 47-82. (Reserve desk, Fish—Ocean Library.)
Montgomery, D. R., E. M. Beamer, G. R. Pess and T. P. Quinn. 1999. Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 56: 377-387.
Mesick, C. F. 1995. Response of brown trout to streamflow, temperature and habitat restoration in a degraded stream. Rivers 5: 75-95.
Power, M. E. et al. 1995. Hydraulic food-chain models. BioScience 45: 159-167.
Scrivener, J. C., T. G. Brown and B. C. Andersen. 1994. Juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncrhynchus tshawytscha) utilization of Hawks Creek, a samall and monatal tributary stream of the upper Frazer River. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 51: 1139-1146.
Torgersen, C. E., D. M. Price, H. W. Li and B. A. McIntosh. 1999. Multiscale thermal refugia and stream habitat associations of Chinook salmon in northeastern Oregon. Ecological Applications. 9: 301-319.
Bisson, P. A. 1982. A system for naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low streamflow. in Armantrout (ed.) Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information, American Fisheries Society, 62-73.
Bjorn, T. C and D. W. Risser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Chapter 4, in Meehan, W. R. (ed.) Influences of Forests & Rangeland Management on Salmonids Fish & Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19: 83-138. (Reserve desk, Fish—Ocean Library.)
Hillman, T. W. and J. S. Griffith. 1987. Summer and winter habitat selection by juvenile Chinook salmon in a highly sedimented Idaho stream. Trans. of the American Fisheries Society. 116: 185-195.
Olson, D. H. 1995, "Juvenile Salmonid Assemblages," COPE Report (1): 7-10.
Conklin, D. J., S. P. Canton, J.W. Chadwick, W. J. Miller. 1995. Habitat suitability curves for selected fish species in the Central Platte River, Nebraska. River 5: 250-266.
Gard, M. 1997. Techinque for adjusting spawning depth habitat utilization curves for availability. River 6: 94-102.
Hatfield, T. and J. Bruce. 2000. Predicting salmonid habitat-flow relationships for streams from western North America. N. Amer. J. Fish. Management. 20: 1005-1015.
Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Development of flushing flows for channel restoration on Rush Creek, California. River 6: 183-193.
Kondolf, G. M. , E. W. Larsen and J. G. Williams. 2000. Measuring and modeling the hydraulic environment for assessing instream flows. N. Amer. J. Fish. Management. 20: 1016-1028.
Ligon, F. K., W. E. Dietrich, and W. J. Trush. 1995. Downstream ecological effects of dams. BioScience 45: 183-192.
Lyons. J. 1995. A test of the IFIM in a Midwestern stream. Rivers 5: 52-55.
Newbury. R. and M. Gaboury. 1993. Exploration and rehabilitation of hydraulic habitats in streams using principles of fluvial behaviour. Fresh. Biol. 29: 195-210.
Payne, T. R. 1995. IFIM: In fact it’s magic. Rivers 5: 56-57.
Stalnaker, C.B., R.T. Milhous, and K.CD. Bovee. 1989. Hydrology and hydraulics applied to fishery management in large rivers. In D.P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. p. 13-30.
Whiting. P.J. 1998. Floodplain maintenance flows. Rivers 6: 160-170.
Vadas, R. L. 1998. Use of physical variables to discriminate visually determined mesohabitat types in North American streams. Rivers 6. 143-159.
Benda, L., T. Beechie, R. C. Wissmar and A. C. Johnson. 1992. Morphology and evolution of salmonid habitats in a recently deglaciated river basin, Washington State, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49(6):1246-1256.
Church, M. 1995. Geomorphic response to river flow regulation: Case studies and time scales. Regulated Rivers. 11: 3-22.
Hogan and M. Church. 1989. Hydraulic geometry in small, coastal streams: progress toward quantification of slmonid habitat. Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 46: 844-852.
Kondolf, G. H. 1995. Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration: uses and limitations. Aquatic consvation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 5: 127-141.
Montgomery, D. R. 1999. Process domains and the river continiuum. J. Amer. Water Resources Assoc. 35: 397-410.
Montgomery, D. R., J. M. Buffington, R. D. Smith, K. M. Schmidt, and G. Pess. 1995. Pool spacing in forest channels. Water Resources Research. 31: 1097-1105.
Montgomery, D. R., T. B. Abbe, J. M. Buffington, N. P. Peterson, K. M. Schmidt and J. D. Stock. 1996. Distribution of bedrock and alluvial channels in forested mountain drainage basons. Nature. 587-589.
Rabeni, C. F. and R. B. Jacobson. 1993. The importance of fluvial hydraulics to fish-habitat restoration in low-gradient alluvial streams. Fresh. Biol. 29: 211-220.
Rosgen 1994, "A classification of natural rivers" Catena 22: 169-199.
Sear, D. A. 1995. Morphological and sedimentological changes in a gravel-bed river following 12 years of flow regulation for hydropower. Regulated Rivers 10: 247-264.
Sidle, R.C. and A.M. Milner. 1989. Stream development in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska, USA. Arctic and Alpine Research. 21(4):350-363.
A guide to placing large wood in streams (May 1995). Oregon Depts. of Forestry, Salem OR.
Abbe, T. B. and D. R, Montgomery. 1996. Large woody debris jams, channel dynamics, and habitat formation in large rivers. Regulated Rivers.12: 201-221.
Abbe, T. B. , D. R, Montgomery and C. Petroff. 1997. Design of stable in-channel wood debris structures for bank protection and habitat restoration: An example from the Cowlitz River, WA. Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Distrurbed by Channel Incision (MLDCI), Langendoen, E. J. (Ed.). University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Beechie, T. J., G. Pess, P. Kennard, R. E. Bilby and S. Bolton. 2000. Modeling recovery rates and pathways for woody debris recruitment in northwestern Washington.streams. N. Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 20: 436-452.
Fetherston, L. K., R. L. Naiman, R. L. Bilby. 1995. Large woody debris, physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest. Geomorphology 13: 133-144.
Gippel, C. J. 1995. Environmental hydraulics of large woody debris in streams and rivers. Journal of Environmental Engineering 121: 388-395.
Hilderbrand, R. H., A. D. Lindy, C. A. Dolloff and K. L. Harpster. 1998. Design considerations for large woody debris placement in stream enhancement projects. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 18(1): 161-167.
Keller, E. A. and F. J. Swanson. 1979. Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial process. Earth Surface Processes. 4: 361-380.
Robison, E. G. and R. L. Beschta. 1990. Characteristics of coarse woody debris for several coastal streams of southwest Alaska. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic. Sci. 47: 1684-1693.
Shields, F. D., Jr., and C. J. Gippel. 1995. Prediction of effects of woody debris removal on flow resistance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 121: 341- 354.
Borchardt 1993, "Flow & restoring macroinvertebrate habitats" Fresh. Biol. 29: 211-227.
Friberg, N., B. Kronvang, L. M. Svendsen, H. O. Hansen. 1994. Restoration of a channelized reach of the River Gelsa, Denmark: effects on the macroinvertebrate community. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 4: 289-296.
Roby, K. B. and D. L. Asuma. 1995. Changes in a reach of a northern California stream following wildfire. Environmental Management 19: 591-600.
Wallace, J. B., J. W. Grubaugh, and M. R. Whiles. 1996. Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: Results from and experimental study. Ecological Applications. 6: 140-151.
Stanford, J. A. and J. V. Ward. 1993. An ecosystem perspective of alluvial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. J. North. Amer. Benthological Society. 12: 48-60
White, D. S. 1993. Perspectives on defining and delineating hyporheic zones. J. North. Amer. Benthological Society. 12: 61-69.
Woessner. W. W. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain groundwater interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Groundwater 38: 423-429.
Cole, D. N. 1995. Disturbance of natural vegetation by camping: Experimental applications of low-level stress. Environmental Management 19: 405-416.
Michener, W.K. and R.A. Haeuber. 1998. Flooding: Natural and managed disturbances. BioScience 48:677-680.
Reeves, G. H., L. E. Benda, K. M. Burnett, P. A. Bisson and J. R. Sedell. 1995. A disturbance-based ecosystem approach to maintaining and restoring freshwater habitats of evolutionary significant units of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17: 334-349.
Wissmar, R. C. and Swanson, F. J. 1990. Landscape Disturbance and Lotic Ecotones. pp.65-89. In: Naiman, R. J. and H. Decamps (eds.). Ecology and Management of Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecotones, Parthenon Press, London.
Aronson, J., S. Dhillion, and E. LeFloc’h. 1995. On the need to select an ecosystem of reference, however imperfect: A reply to Pickett and Parker. 1995. Restoration Ecology 3: 1-3.
Brinson, M. M. and R. Rheinhardt. 1996. The role of reference wetlands in functional assessment and mitigation. Ecological Applications. 6: 69-76.
Collins, B.D. and G.R. Pess. 1997. Critique of Washington's watershed analysis program. J. Am. Wat. Resourc. Assoc. 33:997-1010.
Dahm, C. N., K. W. Cummins, H. M. Valett, and R. L. Coleman. 1995. An ecosystem view of the restoration of the Kissimmee River. Restoration Ecology 3: 225-238.
Frissell, C. A. 1997. Ecological principles. Pages 96-115. in, J. E. Williams, C.A. Wood and M. P. Dombeck, editors. Watershed restoration: principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. (Reserve Desk-Fish Ocean Lib.)
Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss and D. Bayles. 1993. An integrated, biophysical strategy for ecological restoration of large watersheds. Changing Roles of Water Resources Management and Policy, Amer. Water Resources Assoc. June 1993: 449-456.
Hill, M. T. and W. S. Platts. 1998. Ecosystem Restoration: A case study in the Owens River Gorge, California. Fisheries 23 (11): 18-27.
Isaak, D.J. and W.A. Hubert. 1997. Integrating new technologies into fisheries science: the application of geographic information systems. Fisheries 22(1): 6-10.
Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1-15.
Schramm, H.L. and Hubert, W.A. Ecosystem management: Implications for fisheries management. Fisheries 21(12): 6-11.
Stanford, J.A., J.V. Ward, W.J. Liss, C.A. Frisssell, R.N. Williams, J.A. Lichatowich, and C.C. Coutant. 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 12: 391-413.
Weiner, A. H. 1998. Kenai River restoration and management. Fisheries 23 (1):6-10.
Wissmar, R. C. 1997. Historical perspectives. Pages 65-78 in J. E. Williams, C.A. Wood, and M. P. Dombeck (eds.), Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. (Reserve Desk-Fish Ocean Lib.)
Wyant, J. G., R. A. Meganck, S. H. Ham. 1995. A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management 19: 789-796.
"Salvage logging in key watersheds" 1996. Restoration, Oregon Sea Grant.
"Toward a new vision for Pacific salmon." 1997. Restoration, Oregon Sea Grant.
"Overview of the Governor’s coastal salmon plan". 1996. Restoration, Oregon Sea Grant.
Gore, J. A. and F. D. Shields, Jr. 1995. Can large rivers be restored? BioScience 45: 142-152.
Bayley, P. B. 1995. Understanding large river-floodplain ecosystems: Significant economic advantages and increased biodiversity and stability would result from restoration of impaired systems. BioScience 45: 153-158.
Hansaker, C. T. and D. A. Levine. 1995. Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. BioScience 45: 193-203.
Johnson. B. L., W. B. Richardson, T. J. Naimo. 1995. Past, present, and future concepts in large river ecology. BioScience 45: 134-141.
Mitsch, W. J. and R. F. Wilson. 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Ecological Applications. 6: 77-83.
Sear, D. A.. 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic conservation: marine and freshwater ecosystems. 4: 169-177.
Sparks, R. E. 1995. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. BioScience 45:168-182.
Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. 1995. 1995. Ecological dynamics at broad scales. BioScience Supplement. S-29 to S-35.
Walker, K.F. F. Sheldon, and J. T. Puckridge. 1995. A perspective on dryland river ecosystems. Regulated Rivers. 11: 85-104.
Ward, J. V. 1989. The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 8: 2-8.
Chapman, D. W. 1995. Efficacy of structural manipulations of instream habitats in the Columbia River basin. Rivers 5: 279-293.
Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. 1992. "Structural techniques for fluvial restoration" pages 217-261. Book on Reserve in Fish-Ocean Library.
House, R. 1996. An evaluation of stream restoration structures in a coastal Oregon stream, 1981-1993. North Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 16: 272-281.
Kondolf, M. G., J. C. Vick and T. M. Ramirez. 1996. Salmon spawning habitat rehabilitation on the Merced Rover, California: An evaluation of project planning and performance. Transcations of the American Fisheries Society 125: 899-912.
Nickelson, T. E., M. F. Solazzi, S. L. Johnson, and J. D. Rodgers. 1992. The effectiveness of selected stream improvement techniques to create suitable summer and winter rearing habitat for juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in Oregon streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci. 49: 790-794.
Reeves, et al. 1991. Rehabilitating and Modifying Stream Habitats. Chapter 15, in Meehan, W. R. (ed.) Influences of Forests & Rangeland Management on Salmonids Fish & Their Habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19: 519-557. (Reserve desk, Fish—Ocean Library.)
Schmetterling, D. A., and R. W. Pierce. 1999. Success of instream habitat striuctures after a 50-year flood in Gold Creek, Montana. Restoration Ecology 7: 360-368.
Shields, F. D., and C. M. Cooper. 1995. Use of the index of biotic integrity to assess physical habitat degradation in warm water streams. Hydrobiologia 312: 191-208.
Slawski, T.M. and T.J. Ehlinger. 1998. Fish habitat improvement in box culverts: Management in the dark. N. Am. J. Fish. Mgmt. 128:676-685.
Theiling, C. H. 1995. Habitat rehabilitation on the upper Mississippi River. Regulated Rivers 11: 227-238.
Toth, L. A., D. A, Arrington, M. A. Brady, and D. A. Muszick. 1995. Conceptual evaluation of factors potentially affecting restoration of habitat structure within the channelized Kissimmee River ecosystem. Restoration Ecology 3: 160-180.
Recovery of lotic communities and ecosystems following disturbance: Theory and application. Environmental Management 14 (5).
Bradbury, J., P. Cullen, G. Dixon, and M. Pemberton. 1995. Monitoring and management of streambank erosion and natural revegetation on the Lower Gordon River, Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, Australia. Environmental Management 19: 259-272.
Bryant, M. D. 1995. Pulsed monitoring for watershed and stream restoration. Fisheries 20: 6-13.
Monitoring Guidelines to Evaluate Effects of Forestry Activities on Streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska, 1991. L. H. MacDonald, A. W. Smart and R. C. Wissmar, (EPA/CSS), EPA 910/9-91-001. 166 pages.
Morrison, M. L. and B. G. Marcot. 1995. An evaluation of resource inventory and monitoring program used in National Forest planning. Environmental Management 19: 147-156.
Wissmar, R. C. 1993. The need for long-term monitoring programs in forest ecosystems of the Pacific Northwest. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26: 219-234.
Auble, G. T., J. M. Friedman. and M. L. Scott. 1994. Relating riparian vegetation to present and future streamflows. Ecological Applications 4: 544-554.
Bedford, B. L. 1996. The need to define hydrologic equivalence at the landscape scale for freshwater wetland mitigation. Ecological Applications. 6: 57-68.
Bilby, R.E. and L.J. Wasserman. 1989. Forest Practices and riparian management in Washington State: Data based regulation development. From: Practical Approaches to Riparian Resource Management. pp. 87-94
Braatne, J.H., S.B. Rood, and P.E. Heilman. 1997. Life history, ecology, and conservation of riparian cottonwoods in North America. From: Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation. National Research Council, Canada. Ed. R.F. Stettler, H.D. Bradshaw, P.E. Heilman, and T.M. Hinkley. P. 57-85
Elmore, W. R. L. Beschta. 1987. Riparian areas: perceptions in management. Rangelands 9: 260-265.
Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551.
Lisle, T.E. 1989. Channel--dynamic control on the establishment of riparian trees after large floods in northwestern California. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
Maas & Emmingham 1994, "Conifers Planted in Riparian," COPE Report (1): 5-7.
Nilsson, C. and R. Jansson. 1995. Floristic differences between riparian corridors of regulated and free-flowing boreal rivers. Regulated Rivers. 11: 55-66.
Pinay, G. et al. 1992. Control of C, N, P distribution in soils of riparian forests. Landscape Ecology 6: 121-132.
Tabacchi, E, R. D. L. Correll, R. Hauer, G. Pinay, A. P. Tabacchi and R. C. Wissmar. 1988. Landscape connectivity of riparian ecosystems. Freshwater Biol. 40 (3): 497-516 (Abstract only).
Tang, A. W. and D. R. Montgomery. 1995. Riparian buffers and potentially unstable ground. Environmental Management 19: 741-749.
Trush, W.J., E.C. Connor and Knight, A.W. 1989. Alder establishment and channel dynamics in a tributary of the South Fork Eel River, Mendocino County, CA. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-110.
Croonquist, M. J. and R. P. Brooks. 1991. Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas. Environmental Management. 15: 701-714.
Niaman. R. J. Animal influences on ecosystem dynamics: Large animals are more than passive components of ecological systems. BioScience 38: 750-752.
Schlosser, I. J. 1995. Dispersal, boundary processes, and trophic-level interactions in streams adjacent to beaver ponds. Ecology 76: 908-925.
Vesely, D. and B. McComb. 1996. Terrestrial amphibian abundance in riparian strips of the Oregon Coast Range. COP Report 9(6): 6-7.
Alpert, P., F. T. Griggs, and D. R. Peterson. 1999. Riparian forest restoration along large rivers: Initial results from the Sacramento River project. Restoration Ecology 7: 360-368.
D’Angelo et al. 1993. Transient storage in Appalachian and Cascade mountain streams as related to hydraulic characteristics. J. N. Amer. Benthological Soc. 12: 223-235.
Beschta, R L. and J. B. Kauffman. 2000. Restoration of riparian systems-Taking a broader view. International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. American Water Resources Association. 323-328.
Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, W. M. Lewis, Jr. 1995. Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance, and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19: 547-557.
Hey, D. L. and N. S. Philippi. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: The upper Mississippi River basin as a case history. Restoration Ecology 3: 4-17.
Henry, C. P. and C. Amoros. 1995. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I A scientific base. Environmental Management 19: 891- 902.
Henry, C.P., C. Amoros, and Y. Giulani. 1995. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: 2. An example in a former channel of the Rhone River. Environmental Management 19: 903-913
Hoitsma, T. 1996. An innovative method of rooting hardwood cuttings for use in bioengineered streambanks. Wetland Journal 8(3).
Roman, C. T., R. W. Garvine, J. W. Portnoy. 1995. Hydrologic modeling as a predictive basis for ecological restoration of salt marshes. Environmental Management 19: 559-566.
Cairns, J., Jr. and J. R. Pratt. 1995. Ecological restoration through behavioral change. Restoration Ecology 3: 51-53.
Dynesius, M. and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266: 753-762.
Frissell, C. A. Topology of extinction and endangerment of native fishes in the Pacific Northwest and California (U.S.A). Conservation Biology 7: 342-354.
Naiman, R. J., J. J. Magnuson, D. M. McKnight, J. A. Stanford, and J. R. Karr. 1995.
Freshwater ecosystems and their management: A national initiative. Science 270: 584-585.
Rahr, G.R. III, J.A. Lichatowich, R. Hubley, and S.M. Whideen. 1998. Sanctuaries for native salmon: A conservation strategy for the 21st century. Fisheries 23(4): 6, 7, 36, 37.
Reid, T. S. and D. D. Murphy. 1995. Providing a regional context for local conservation action. BioScience Supplement. S-84 to S-90.
Ward, J. V. and J. A. Standford. 1995. Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regulated Rivers 11: 105-119.
Decamps, H., A. M. Planty-Tabacchi, and E. Tabacchi. 1995. Changes in the hydrological regime and invasions by plant species along riparian systems of the Adour River, France. Regulated Rivers 11: 23-33.
Ruesink, I. M. Parker, M. J. Groom, and P. M. Kareiva. 1995. Reducing the risks of nonindigenous species introductions. BioScience 45: 465-477.
Independent Scientific Group. 1999. Return to the river: Scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River. Fisheries. 24: 10-19.
Lawson. P. W. 1993. Cycles in ocean productivity, trends in habitat quality, and the restoration of salmon runs in Oregon. Fisheries. 18(8): 6-10.
Lee, D.C. and W. E. Grant. 1995. A hierarchical approach to fisheries planning and modeling in the Columbia River basin. Environmental Management 19: 17-25.
Smith. 1994. Cultural diversity and restoring salmon. Fisheries 19(2): 20-26.
Wunderlich, R. C., B. D. Winter, and J. H. Meyer. 1994. Restoration of the Elwha River ecosystem. Fisheries 19: 11-19.
Connor, E. D. Reiser, K. Binkley, D. Paige and K. Lynch. 1997. Abundance and distribution of an unexploited bull trout population in the Cedar River watershed, Washington. Friends of the Bull Trout Conference Proceedings. 403-411.
Perkins, S.J. 1994. The Shrinking Cedar River—Channel Changes following flow regulation andbank armoring. From: Effects of human-induced changes on hydrologic systems. American Water Resources Association pp 649-659.
Beechie, T., E. Beamer, and L. Wasserman. 1994. Estimating Coho salmon rearing habitat and smolt production losses in a large river basin, and implications for habitat restoration. North Amer. J. Fisheries Management. 14: 797-811.
Matthews, K. R. 1996. Habitat selection and movement patterns of California golden trout in degraded and recovering stream sections in Golden Trout Wilderness, California. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:579-590.
Ward, J. V., and K. Tockner. 2001. Biodiversity: toward a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biology 46 807-819.
Geist, D. R. and D. D. Dauble. 1998. Redd site selection and spawning habitat use by fall Chinook salmon: the importance of geomorphic features in large river. Environmental Management 22: 655-669.
Hunter, C.J. 1991. The trout and the stream. Chapter 2. Pages 11-38 in C.J. Hunter (ed.), Better Trout Habitat. Island Press, Cavelo, California.
Juajda, P., and J. B. Layzer. 1999. Comparative nursery habitat use by 0+ fish in a modified lowland river. Regulated Rivers—Research and Management 15 113.
Latterell, J. J., R. J. Naiman, B. R. Fransesn, and P. A. Bisson. (in review). Physical constraints on trout distributions in the Cascade Mountains: a comparison of logged and unlogged streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.
Swales, S., R. B. Lauzier and C. D. Levings. 1986. Winter habitat preferences of juvenile salmonids in two interior rivers in British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 64: 1506-1514.
Baxter, C. V. and F. R. Hauer. 2000. Geomorphology, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57: 1470-1481.
Chapin, D. M., R. L. Beschta, and H. W. Shen. 2000. Flood frequencies required to sustain riparian plant communities in the upper Klamath Basin, Oregon. In P.J. Wiggington and R. L. Beschta (eds.) International Conference on riparian ecology and management in multi-landuse watersheds. Middleburg, VA. American Water Resources Association pp.17-22.
Lane, S. N., and K. S. Richards. 1997. Linking river channel form and process: Time, space and causality revisited. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22 249-260.
Leclerc, M., A. Boudrealut, J. Bechara, and G. Corfa. 1995. Two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling: a neglected tool in the instream flow incremental methodology. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 124 645-662.
May, C. W., and R. R. Horner. 2000. The cumulative impacts of watershed urbanization on stream-riparian ecosystems. In: P. J. Wiggington, and R. L. Beschta (eds.) International Conference on Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-Land Use Watersheds. Middleburg, VA. American Water Resources Association. 281-286.
Newbury. R. and M. Gaboury. 1993. Exploration and rehabilitation of hydraulic habitats in streams using principles of fluvial behaviour. Fresh. Biol. 29: 195-210. 571 - 587.
Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47 769-784.
Whiting, P. J. 2002. Streamflow necessary for environmental maintenance. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 30 181-206.
Church, M. 2002. Geomorphic thresholds in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47 541-557.
Fitzpatrick, F. A. 2001. A comparison of multi-disciplinary methods for measuring physical conditions in streams. In: Dorava, J. M., D. R. Montgomery, B. B. Palcsak, and F. A. Fitzpatrick (eds.) Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. Water Science Application 4. Washington, D. C., American Geophysical Union. Pp 7-18.
Gore, J. A. 2001. Models of habitat use and availability to evaluate anthropogenic changes in channel geometry. In: Dorava, J. M., D. R. Montgomery, B. B. Palcsak, and F. A. Fitzpatrick (eds.) Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. Water Science Application 4. Washington, D. C., American Geophysical Union. Pp 27-36.
Montgomery, D. R. 2001. Geomorphology, river ecology, and ecosystem management. In: Dorava, J. M., D. R. Montgomery, B. B. Palcsak, and F. A. Fitzpatrick (eds.) Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. Water Science Application 4. Washington, D. C., American Geophysical Union. 247-253.
Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell, and C. E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37 130-137.
Bilby, R. E. and J. W. Ward. 1989. Changes in characteristics and function of woody debris with increasing size of streams in western Washington. Trans. Amer. Fisheries Soc. 118: 368-378.
Collins, B. D., D. R. Montgomery, and A. Haas. 2002. Historic changes in the distribution and functions of large woody debris in Puget Lowland rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59 66-76.
Wellnitz, T. A., N. L. Poff, G. Cosyleon, and B. Steury. 2001. Current velocity and spatial scale as determinants of the distribution of two rheophillic herbivorous insects. Landscape Ecology 16 (2) 111-120.
Richards, K., J. Brasington, and F. Hughes. 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: ecological implications and a potential modeling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47 559-579.
Bisson, P. A. The importance of identification of limiting factors in an evaluation program. 22p.
Galat, D.L. et al. 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. BioScience 48:721-733.
Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Orting, and D. Lytien. 1997. An ecological perspective on riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22 12-24.
Niemi, G. J., P. Devore, N. Detenback, D. Taylor, A. Lima, J. Pastor, J. D. Yount and R. J. Naiman. 1990. Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environmental Management 14 571-587.
Wissmar, R.C. and R. Beschta. 1998. Restoration and the management of riparian ecosystems. Freshwater. Biol. 40:571-585.
Jungworth, M., S. Muhar, and S. Schmutz. 2002. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47 867-887.
Kentula, M. E. 1997. A step toward a landscape approach in riparian restoration. Restoration Ecology 5 2-3.
Lewis, C. A., N. P. Lester, A. D. Bradshaw, J. E. Fitzgibbon, K. Fuller, L. Hakanason, and C. Richards. 1996. Considerations of scale in habitat conservation and restoration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 53 (Suppl. 1) 440-445.
Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47 501-515.
Winter, T. C. 2001. The concept of hydrologic landscapes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 37 335 — 349.
Berge, S. D., S. B. Bolton, and J. L. Fridley. 2001. Ecological engineering: Design based on ecological principles. Ecological Engineering 18
Karr, J. R., and E. W. Chu. 1999. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia. 00 1-13.
Anderson, E., C. Nilsson, and M. E. Johansson. 2000. Effects of river fragmentation on plant dispersal and riparian flora. Regulated Rivers — Research and Management.
Jansson, R. C. Nilson, M. Dynesius, and E. Andersson. 2000. Effects of river regulation on river-margin vegetation: A comparison of. Ecological Applications 10 (1) 203-224.
Liquori, M., and C. R. Jackson. 2001. Channel response from shrub dominated riparian communities and associated effects on salmonid habitat. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37 1639-1651.
McAllister, L. S., B. E. Peniston, S. G. Liebowitz, B. Abbruzzese, and J. R. Hyman. 2000. A synoptic assessment for prioritizing wetland restoration efforts to optimize flood attenuation. Wetlands 20 (1) 70-83.
Pastor, J. 1995. Ecosystem management, ecological risk, and public policy. Bioscience 45 286-288.